Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 4, 365 - 374, 01.10.2022

Avni Ürem Çürük Emre Alptekin

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1102405

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Aczél J, Saaty TL. 1983. Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments. J Math Psychol, 27(1): 93-102.
  • Aker JC. 2011. Dial “a” for agriculture: A review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agri Econ, 42(6): 631-647.
  • Al-Mansour F, Jejcic V. 2017. A model calculation of the carbon footprint of agricultural products: the case of Slovenia. Energy, 136: 7-15.
  • Appel A, Franz M, Hassler M. 2014. Intermediaries in agro-food networks in Turkey: how middlemen respond to transforming food market structures. J Geog Soc Berlin, 145(3): 148-157.
  • Atasoy Y. 2017. Repossession, Re‐informalization and Dispossession: The ‘Muddy Terrain’ of Land Commodification in Turkey. J Agrarian Chan, 17(4): 657-679.
  • Baris ME, Uslu A. 2009. Cut flower production and marketing in Türkiye. African J Agri Res, 4(9): 765-771.
  • Bignebat C, Koç AA, Lemeilleur S. 2009. Small producers, supermarkets, and the role of intermediaries in Turkey's fresh fruit and vegetable market. Agri Econ, 40(S1): 807-816.
  • Burnett S, Mattson N, Krug B, Lopez R. 2011. Floriculture sustainability research coalition: bringing the latest sustainability research to the industry. Hort Technol,21(6): 692-693.
  • Clapp J, Newell P, Brent ZW. 2018. The global political economy of climate change, agriculture and food systems. J Peasant Stud, 45(1): 80-88.
  • Dantsis T, Douma C, Giourga C, Loumou A, Polychronaki EA. 2010. A methodological approach to assess and compare the sustainability level of agricultural plant production systems. Ecol Indic, 10(2): 256-263.
  • de Janvry A. 2010. Agriculture for development: New paradigm and options for success. Agri Econ, 41(1): 17-36.
  • Demirel NÇ, Yücenur GN, Demirel T, Muşdal H. 2012. Risk-based evaluation of Turkish agricultural strategies using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy ANP. Human Ecol Risk Asses Int J, 18(3): 685-702.
  • Fan S. 2020. Reflections of food policy evolution over the last three decades. App Econ Persp Pol, 42(3): 380–394.
  • Gebreeyesus M. 2015. Firm adoption of international standards: Evidence from the Ethiopian floriculture sector. AgriEcon, 46(S1): 139-155.
  • GTHB. 2017. Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock Strategic Plan 2018-2022. URL: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SGB/Belgeler/2013-2017/GTHB%202018-2022%20STRATEJI%CC%87K% 20PLAN.PDF (access date: December 08, 2018).
  • Hall TJ, Dennis JH, Lopez RG, Marshall MI. 2009. Factors affecting growers’ willingness to adopt sustainable floriculture practices. Hort Sci, 44(5): 1346-1351.
  • ITC. 2021. International Trade Centre Statistics, Trade Map. Product: 06 Live trees and other plants; bulbs, roots and the like; cut flowers and ornamental foliage. URL: https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx (access date: October 07, 2021).
  • Larson D, Martin W, Sahin S, Tsigas M. 2016. Agricultural policies and trade paths in Turkey. World Econ, 39(8): 1194-1224.
  • Lee DR, Barrett CB, McPeak JG. 2006. Policy, technology and management strategies for achieving sustainable agricultural intensification. Agri Econ, 34(2): 123-127.
  • Loizou E, Karelakis C, Galanopoulos K, Mattas K. 2019. The role of agriculture as a development tool for a regional economy. Agril Sys, 173: 482-490.
  • Mekonnen DK, Spielman DJ, Fonsah EG, Dorfman JH. 2015. Innovation systems and technical efficiency in developing‐country agriculture. Agri Econ, 46(5): 689-702.
  • Muhammad A, Amponsah WA, Dennis JH. 2010. The impact of preferential trade arrangements on EU imports from developing countries: The case of fresh-cut flowers. App Econ Persp Pol, 32(2): 254-274.
  • Mulder J, Brent AC. 2006. Selection of sustainable rural agriculture projects in South Africa: Case studies in the Landcare Programme. J Sust Agri, 28(2): 55-84.
  • Norton GW. 2020. Lessons from a career in agricultural development and research evaluation. App Econ Persp Pol, 42(2): 151-167.
  • Pannell DJ, Schilizzi S. 1999. Sustainable agriculture: A matter of ecology, equity, economic efficiency or expedience? J Sust Agri, 13(4): 57-66.
  • Pawlak K, Kołodziejczak M. 2020. The role of agriculture in ensuring food security in developing countries: Considerations in the context of the problem of sustainable food production. Sust, 12(13): 5488. DOI: 10.3390/su12135488.
  • Reig‐Martínez E, Gómez‐Limón JA, Picazo‐Tadeo AJ. 2011. Ranking farms with a composite indicator of sustainability. Agri Econ, 42(5): 561-575.
  • Saaty TL. 2004. Fundamentals of the analytic network process—multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks. J Sys Sci Sys Eng, 13(3): 348-379.
  • Saaty TL. 2006. The analytic network process. In: Saaty TL, Vargas LG (Eds), Decision Making With the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risk. Springer Science+Business Media LLC, New York, US, pp: 1-39.
  • SÜSBİR. 2020. Ornamental plants sector report. URL: http://www.susbir.org.tr/belgeler/raporlar/sus-bitkileri-sektor-raporu.pdf (access date: October 01, 2021).
  • Talukder B, Hipel KW, van Loon GW. 2018. Using multi‐criteria decision analysis for assessing sustainability of agricultural systems. Sust Devel, 26(6): 781-799.
  • TÜİK. 2021. Turkish Statistical Institute, Plant Production Statistics. URL: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/Get Kategori? p=Tarim-111 (access date: October 07, 2021).
  • TÜSSİDE. 2017. Seed sector national strategy development project: The ornamental plants growers union, ornamental plants sector national strategy report. URL: http://www.susbir.org.tr/images/duyurular/ulusal-strateji-raporu.pdf (access date: December 06, 2018).
  • Veisi H, Liaghati H, Alipour A. 2016. Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Ecol Indic, 60(1): 644-654.
  • Wani MA, Nazki IT, Din A, Iqbal S, Wani SA, Khan FU, Neelofar K. 2018. Floriculture Sustainability Initiative: The Dawn of New Era. In: Lichtfouse E (Ed), Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 27, Springer International Publishing, Cham, New York, US, pp: 91–127.
  • Weihrich H. 1982. The TOWS Matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Plan, 15(2): 54-66.
  • Wijnands J. 2005. Sustainable International networks in the flower industry: Bridging empirical findings and theoretical approaches. Int Soc Horti Sci, Leuven, Belgium, pp: 92.
  • Wijnmalen DJ. 2007. Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP–ANP: A critical validation. Math Comp Model, 46(7-8): 892-905.
  • Zencirkiran M, Gürbüz IB. 2009. Turkish ornamental plants sector in the European Union screening process. J Fruit Ornaml Plant Res, 17(2): 235-250.
  • Zilberman D, Gordon B, Hochman G, Wesseler J. 2018. Economics of sustainable development and the bioeconomy. App Econ Persp Pol, 40(1): 22-37.

Developing Sustainable Agriculture Strategies: Turkish Floriculture Case

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 4, 365 - 374, 01.10.2022

Avni Ürem Çürük Emre Alptekin

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1102405

Öz

While Floriculture maintains its importance for many countries and cultures with its commercial possibilities, global players had to differentiate their approach to the industry because of the shift of the production towards developing countries and the change in competitive dynamics. Türkiye’s slow progress in Floriculture and the inefficacy to use its potential presents a unique opportunity to develop a sustainability-oriented strategy to differentiate Türkiye from its competitors. Hence, this work focuses on Turkish floriculture industry dynamics and aims to propose sustainable strategies using a Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)-based model. A comprehensive Strength Weakness Opportunities Threats (SWOT) analysis highlighting Turkish Floriculture’s current state is used for that purpose. The economic, environmental, and socio-political dimensions of sustainability in the floriculture industry are also considered via an Analytical Network Process (ANP) model. The analysis results are used to define a sustainable floriculture strategy with its benefits-opportunities and costs-risks (BOCR) merits. Based on the findings, the economic dimension of sustainability takes precedence over the other two dimensions, and an efficient floriculture strategy needs to focus on logistics and marketing in a developing country like Türkiye.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Floriculture industry Sustainable agriculture ANP-BOCR SWOT analysis

Kaynakça

  • Aczél J, Saaty TL. 1983. Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments. J Math Psychol, 27(1): 93-102.
  • Aker JC. 2011. Dial “a” for agriculture: A review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agri Econ, 42(6): 631-647.
  • Al-Mansour F, Jejcic V. 2017. A model calculation of the carbon footprint of agricultural products: the case of Slovenia. Energy, 136: 7-15.
  • Appel A, Franz M, Hassler M. 2014. Intermediaries in agro-food networks in Turkey: how middlemen respond to transforming food market structures. J Geog Soc Berlin, 145(3): 148-157.
  • Atasoy Y. 2017. Repossession, Re‐informalization and Dispossession: The ‘Muddy Terrain’ of Land Commodification in Turkey. J Agrarian Chan, 17(4): 657-679.
  • Baris ME, Uslu A. 2009. Cut flower production and marketing in Türkiye. African J Agri Res, 4(9): 765-771.
  • Bignebat C, Koç AA, Lemeilleur S. 2009. Small producers, supermarkets, and the role of intermediaries in Turkey's fresh fruit and vegetable market. Agri Econ, 40(S1): 807-816.
  • Burnett S, Mattson N, Krug B, Lopez R. 2011. Floriculture sustainability research coalition: bringing the latest sustainability research to the industry. Hort Technol,21(6): 692-693.
  • Clapp J, Newell P, Brent ZW. 2018. The global political economy of climate change, agriculture and food systems. J Peasant Stud, 45(1): 80-88.
  • Dantsis T, Douma C, Giourga C, Loumou A, Polychronaki EA. 2010. A methodological approach to assess and compare the sustainability level of agricultural plant production systems. Ecol Indic, 10(2): 256-263.
  • de Janvry A. 2010. Agriculture for development: New paradigm and options for success. Agri Econ, 41(1): 17-36.
  • Demirel NÇ, Yücenur GN, Demirel T, Muşdal H. 2012. Risk-based evaluation of Turkish agricultural strategies using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy ANP. Human Ecol Risk Asses Int J, 18(3): 685-702.
  • Fan S. 2020. Reflections of food policy evolution over the last three decades. App Econ Persp Pol, 42(3): 380–394.
  • Gebreeyesus M. 2015. Firm adoption of international standards: Evidence from the Ethiopian floriculture sector. AgriEcon, 46(S1): 139-155.
  • GTHB. 2017. Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock Strategic Plan 2018-2022. URL: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SGB/Belgeler/2013-2017/GTHB%202018-2022%20STRATEJI%CC%87K% 20PLAN.PDF (access date: December 08, 2018).
  • Hall TJ, Dennis JH, Lopez RG, Marshall MI. 2009. Factors affecting growers’ willingness to adopt sustainable floriculture practices. Hort Sci, 44(5): 1346-1351.
  • ITC. 2021. International Trade Centre Statistics, Trade Map. Product: 06 Live trees and other plants; bulbs, roots and the like; cut flowers and ornamental foliage. URL: https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx (access date: October 07, 2021).
  • Larson D, Martin W, Sahin S, Tsigas M. 2016. Agricultural policies and trade paths in Turkey. World Econ, 39(8): 1194-1224.
  • Lee DR, Barrett CB, McPeak JG. 2006. Policy, technology and management strategies for achieving sustainable agricultural intensification. Agri Econ, 34(2): 123-127.
  • Loizou E, Karelakis C, Galanopoulos K, Mattas K. 2019. The role of agriculture as a development tool for a regional economy. Agril Sys, 173: 482-490.
  • Mekonnen DK, Spielman DJ, Fonsah EG, Dorfman JH. 2015. Innovation systems and technical efficiency in developing‐country agriculture. Agri Econ, 46(5): 689-702.
  • Muhammad A, Amponsah WA, Dennis JH. 2010. The impact of preferential trade arrangements on EU imports from developing countries: The case of fresh-cut flowers. App Econ Persp Pol, 32(2): 254-274.
  • Mulder J, Brent AC. 2006. Selection of sustainable rural agriculture projects in South Africa: Case studies in the Landcare Programme. J Sust Agri, 28(2): 55-84.
  • Norton GW. 2020. Lessons from a career in agricultural development and research evaluation. App Econ Persp Pol, 42(2): 151-167.
  • Pannell DJ, Schilizzi S. 1999. Sustainable agriculture: A matter of ecology, equity, economic efficiency or expedience? J Sust Agri, 13(4): 57-66.
  • Pawlak K, Kołodziejczak M. 2020. The role of agriculture in ensuring food security in developing countries: Considerations in the context of the problem of sustainable food production. Sust, 12(13): 5488. DOI: 10.3390/su12135488.
  • Reig‐Martínez E, Gómez‐Limón JA, Picazo‐Tadeo AJ. 2011. Ranking farms with a composite indicator of sustainability. Agri Econ, 42(5): 561-575.
  • Saaty TL. 2004. Fundamentals of the analytic network process—multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks. J Sys Sci Sys Eng, 13(3): 348-379.
  • Saaty TL. 2006. The analytic network process. In: Saaty TL, Vargas LG (Eds), Decision Making With the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risk. Springer Science+Business Media LLC, New York, US, pp: 1-39.
  • SÜSBİR. 2020. Ornamental plants sector report. URL: http://www.susbir.org.tr/belgeler/raporlar/sus-bitkileri-sektor-raporu.pdf (access date: October 01, 2021).
  • Talukder B, Hipel KW, van Loon GW. 2018. Using multi‐criteria decision analysis for assessing sustainability of agricultural systems. Sust Devel, 26(6): 781-799.
  • TÜİK. 2021. Turkish Statistical Institute, Plant Production Statistics. URL: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/Get Kategori? p=Tarim-111 (access date: October 07, 2021).
  • TÜSSİDE. 2017. Seed sector national strategy development project: The ornamental plants growers union, ornamental plants sector national strategy report. URL: http://www.susbir.org.tr/images/duyurular/ulusal-strateji-raporu.pdf (access date: December 06, 2018).
  • Veisi H, Liaghati H, Alipour A. 2016. Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Ecol Indic, 60(1): 644-654.
  • Wani MA, Nazki IT, Din A, Iqbal S, Wani SA, Khan FU, Neelofar K. 2018. Floriculture Sustainability Initiative: The Dawn of New Era. In: Lichtfouse E (Ed), Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 27, Springer International Publishing, Cham, New York, US, pp: 91–127.
  • Weihrich H. 1982. The TOWS Matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Plan, 15(2): 54-66.
  • Wijnands J. 2005. Sustainable International networks in the flower industry: Bridging empirical findings and theoretical approaches. Int Soc Horti Sci, Leuven, Belgium, pp: 92.
  • Wijnmalen DJ. 2007. Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP–ANP: A critical validation. Math Comp Model, 46(7-8): 892-905.
  • Zencirkiran M, Gürbüz IB. 2009. Turkish ornamental plants sector in the European Union screening process. J Fruit Ornaml Plant Res, 17(2): 235-250.
  • Zilberman D, Gordon B, Hochman G, Wesseler J. 2018. Economics of sustainable development and the bioeconomy. App Econ Persp Pol, 40(1): 22-37.
Toplam 40 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Research Articles
Yazarlar

Avni Ürem Çürük 0000-0001-5637-8182

Emre Alptekin 0000-0003-3555-2684

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ekim 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 12 Nisan 2022
Kabul Tarihi 7 Temmuz 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Çürük, A. Ü., & Alptekin, E. (2022). Developing Sustainable Agriculture Strategies: Turkish Floriculture Case. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 5(4), 365-374. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1102405
 Kapak Resmi İndir

                                                  24890