Abstract
The large
number of occupational accidents in Turkey and among the first businesses in
terms of serious consequences is located in metalworking manufacturing sector.
It is understood that necessary precautions have not been taken in occupational
accidents that have been referred to as judicial cases for occupational health
and safety. A significant proportion of job accidents that have been referred
to as forensic cases are occupational accidents that occur in the form of
losing to machines, splashing and dropping a material. With this research, it
is aimed to determine the defects of these dead accidents by examining the
occupational accidents that occurred in the form of losing to the machines,
splashing and dropping of a material, so that these dead accidents do not occur
again. In these work incidents, the autopsy and the place where the win
occurred, the necessary data were collected and necessary photographs were
made. It is understood that the necessary precautions have not been taken in
the occupational accidents, which are referred to as judicial cases, in terms
of occupational health and safety. These dead work accidents are a problem that
must be resolved as a country reality and it is understood that the experts are
invited to dead work accidents in every insecure environment and conditions
that are not secured and supervised. These dead work accidents are highly
accidents and very serious work accidents that need to be solved. This work
focuses on fatal accidents and deaths in the form of losing machines, bouncing
a ball and dropping a ball. It has been determined that the security problem,
which is frequently detected in dead occupational accidents, is caused by
conscious and unconscious human error. Work accidents in the form of losing to
various machines in our country, splashing and dropping of a material have been
investigated and it has been determined that the causes of these dead accidents
are defective at the same time and suggestions are offered to prevent such dead
accidents. Law No. 6331, when examined in its entirety, can be said to have not
brought rooted and effective rules aimed at lifting the adverse conditions
causing work accidents and occupational diseases, contrary to the claim it
carries. These are workplaces with between 1 and 49 employees who account for
52 percent of the workplace casualties in 2013 and 2017, 66 percent of the
active employers and 61 percent of the workplace. It has been determined that
these workplaces are performed in workplace health and safety unit, workplace physician,
job security engineer, workplace nurse or work place where health officer does
not have employment requirement. Employers have not been given the opportunity
to be a "job security specialist and/or workplace physician", which
would create problems on the business scene. Since this situation is clearly
contrary to the rule of professional independence, it is possible to say that
the limited authority given to the work physician or job security specialist
will also be dysfunctional.
References
- 1. Cotter, D.M. (1986). Work-related deaths in 1984: BLS survey findings. Monthly Labor Review, 109, 42–45.
- 2. Gens, D., Jones, J.W. & Nesbit, G. (1984). The Employee Injury Profile. St. Paul, MN: The St. Paul Companies.
- 3. Hansen, C. (1989). A casual model of the relationship among accidents, biodata, personality, and cognitive factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 (1), 81–90.
- 4. Jones, J.W. (1989). A personnel selection approach to industrial safety. Paper presented at the 97 th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, August 13.
- 5. Jones, J.W. (1991). Accident prevention through personnel selection. In J. Jones, Editor,Preemployment Honesty Testing: Current Research and Future Directions. Westport, CT: Quorum Books
- 6. Jones, J.W. (1991). Accident prevention through personnel selection. In J. Jones, Editor, Preemployment Honesty Testing: Current Research and Future Directions. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
- 7. Jones, J.W. & Foreman, R. (1984). Relationship of PSI-3S safety scale scores to motor vehicle reports. St. Paul, MN: Technical Report: The St. Paul Fire and Marine, The Human Factors Department.
- 8. Jones, J.W. & Wuebker, L.J. (1985). Development and validation of the Safety Locus of Control Scale.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 151–161.
- 9. Jones, J.W. & Wuebker, L.J. (1988). The psychological assessment of employees' safety potential. Park Ridge, IL: Technical Report, London House, Inc., Research and Development Group.
- 10. Montag, I. & Comrey, A.I. (1987). Internality and externality as correlates of involvement in fatal driving accidents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72 (3), 339-343.
- 11. National Safety Council (1983). Accident facts 1983 edition. Chicago, IL: National Safety Council.
- 12. Wuebker, L.J. (1987). The Safety Locus of Control Scale: a construct validation study. Unpublished manuscript.
- 13. Wuebker, L.J., Jones, J.W., & DuBois, D. (1985). Safety locus of control and employees' accidents. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Industrial/Organizational Psychology Graduate Student Conference, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, April 12–14.
- 14. Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and implied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96–102.
- 15. Zile M., (2013). Adliyeye İntikal Eden İş Kazaların Analizi ve Nedensellik Modellemesinin Oluşturulması, VII. Ulusal İşçi Sağlığı ve İş Güvenliği Kongresi, Yayın No: E/2013/600, ISBN: 978-605-01-0469-1, 435-439, Çukurova Üniversitesi Adana.
- 16. Zile M., (2015). Bakım Ve Onarım Kaynaklı Adli Vaka İş Kazalarında Sebeplendirme Yaklaşımları Ve Alınması Gereken Önlemler, VIII. Ulusal İşçi Sağlığı ve İş Güvenliği Kongresi, Yayın No:E/2015/635, ISBN: 978-605-01-0710-4, 626, Çukurova Üniversitesi Adana.
- 17. Zile M. (2016). Maden Ocaklarında İş Güvenliğini Artırmak İçin Bulanık Mantık Temelli Oluşturulan İş Güvenliği Risk Analiz Modellemesi ve Yazılımı, International Conference Safety & Health (Uluslararası 8. İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Konferansı) 8-11 May 2016, Tiosconference, Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı Yayın No:61, İstanbul, 471-479.
- 18. Zile M. (2017). Ülkemizde Gerçekleşen Elektrik İş Kazaları Ve Bu Kazalardaki Kusur Oranlarının Belirlenmesi, International Conference on Multidisciplinary, Science, Engineering and Technology (IMESET’17Bitlis), e - ISBN: 978-605-82480-3-8, Oct27-29, Bitlis, 234-239.
Abstract
Yapılan bu araştırma ile makinelere kaptırma,
bir maddenin sıçraması ve düşmesi şeklinde gerçekleşen ölümlü iş kazaları
incelenerek, bu kazalardaki kusurların neler olduğu tespit edilerek tekrar bu
kazaların oluşmaması amaçlanmaktadır. Gerçekleşen bu ölümlü iş kazalarında otopside
ve kazanın oluştuğu yerde incelemeler yapılarak gerekli veriler toplanmış ve
gerekli fotoğraflamalar yapılmıştır. Adli vaka olarak adliyeye intikal eden bu ölümlü iş kazalarında,
işyerlerinde iş sağlığı ve güvenliği açısından
gerekli tedbirlerin alınmadığı anlaşılmaktadır. Yaşanan bu iş kazaları bir ülke
gerçeği olarak karşımızda çözülmesi gereken bir sorun olarak durmakta, uzman
kişilerce güvenliği ve denetimi yapılmayan her türlü güvensiz ortam ve koşullar
iş kazalarına davetiye çıkarttığı anlaşılmaktadır. Bu ölümlü iş kazaları
yüksek oranlı ve çözülmesi gerekli çok ciddi iş kazalarındandır.
Yapılan bu çalışmayla makinelere
kaptırma, bir maddenin sıçraması ve düşmesi şeklinde gerçekleşen ölümlü iş kazalarına
ve sebeplerine odaklanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada diğer risklerden ziyade makinelere kaptırma, bir maddenin sıçrama ve
düşme riskleri, sebepleri ve yapılması gereken önlemler üzerinde durulur. Bu gerçekleşen ölümlü iş kazalarında
sıklıkla tespit edilen güvenlik sorununun bilinçli ve bilinçsiz insan
hatasından kaynaklandığı belirlenmiştir. Ülkemizde meydana gelen çeşitli makinelere kaptırma, bir maddenin sıçraması
ve düşmesi şeklinde gerçekleşen ölümlü iş kazaları incelenmiş,
bu kazaların sebepleri kimlerin ne oranda kusurlu olduğu saptanmış ve bu tür
kazaların oluşmasını engellemek için öneriler sunulmuştur.
References
- 1. Cotter, D.M. (1986). Work-related deaths in 1984: BLS survey findings. Monthly Labor Review, 109, 42–45.
- 2. Gens, D., Jones, J.W. & Nesbit, G. (1984). The Employee Injury Profile. St. Paul, MN: The St. Paul Companies.
- 3. Hansen, C. (1989). A casual model of the relationship among accidents, biodata, personality, and cognitive factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 (1), 81–90.
- 4. Jones, J.W. (1989). A personnel selection approach to industrial safety. Paper presented at the 97 th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, August 13.
- 5. Jones, J.W. (1991). Accident prevention through personnel selection. In J. Jones, Editor,Preemployment Honesty Testing: Current Research and Future Directions. Westport, CT: Quorum Books
- 6. Jones, J.W. (1991). Accident prevention through personnel selection. In J. Jones, Editor, Preemployment Honesty Testing: Current Research and Future Directions. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
- 7. Jones, J.W. & Foreman, R. (1984). Relationship of PSI-3S safety scale scores to motor vehicle reports. St. Paul, MN: Technical Report: The St. Paul Fire and Marine, The Human Factors Department.
- 8. Jones, J.W. & Wuebker, L.J. (1985). Development and validation of the Safety Locus of Control Scale.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 151–161.
- 9. Jones, J.W. & Wuebker, L.J. (1988). The psychological assessment of employees' safety potential. Park Ridge, IL: Technical Report, London House, Inc., Research and Development Group.
- 10. Montag, I. & Comrey, A.I. (1987). Internality and externality as correlates of involvement in fatal driving accidents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72 (3), 339-343.
- 11. National Safety Council (1983). Accident facts 1983 edition. Chicago, IL: National Safety Council.
- 12. Wuebker, L.J. (1987). The Safety Locus of Control Scale: a construct validation study. Unpublished manuscript.
- 13. Wuebker, L.J., Jones, J.W., & DuBois, D. (1985). Safety locus of control and employees' accidents. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Industrial/Organizational Psychology Graduate Student Conference, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, April 12–14.
- 14. Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and implied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96–102.
- 15. Zile M., (2013). Adliyeye İntikal Eden İş Kazaların Analizi ve Nedensellik Modellemesinin Oluşturulması, VII. Ulusal İşçi Sağlığı ve İş Güvenliği Kongresi, Yayın No: E/2013/600, ISBN: 978-605-01-0469-1, 435-439, Çukurova Üniversitesi Adana.
- 16. Zile M., (2015). Bakım Ve Onarım Kaynaklı Adli Vaka İş Kazalarında Sebeplendirme Yaklaşımları Ve Alınması Gereken Önlemler, VIII. Ulusal İşçi Sağlığı ve İş Güvenliği Kongresi, Yayın No:E/2015/635, ISBN: 978-605-01-0710-4, 626, Çukurova Üniversitesi Adana.
- 17. Zile M. (2016). Maden Ocaklarında İş Güvenliğini Artırmak İçin Bulanık Mantık Temelli Oluşturulan İş Güvenliği Risk Analiz Modellemesi ve Yazılımı, International Conference Safety & Health (Uluslararası 8. İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Konferansı) 8-11 May 2016, Tiosconference, Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı Yayın No:61, İstanbul, 471-479.
- 18. Zile M. (2017). Ülkemizde Gerçekleşen Elektrik İş Kazaları Ve Bu Kazalardaki Kusur Oranlarının Belirlenmesi, International Conference on Multidisciplinary, Science, Engineering and Technology (IMESET’17Bitlis), e - ISBN: 978-605-82480-3-8, Oct27-29, Bitlis, 234-239.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 31, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 1 Issue: 1 |
